Tuesday, January 28, 2014

How Many Times Has Obama Violated Budget Deadline Laws? (We Have the Answer)

 

President Barack Obama’s White House will miss another in-law budget deadline this year, marking the 18th time it has done so, according to Senate Republicans.

How Many Times Has Obama Violated Budget Deadline Laws? (We Have the Answer)

The Obama administration has missed every deadline to submit a budget since he first took office in 2009 (Getty Images)

“The Office of Management and Budget recently announced that President Obama’s FY 2015 budget would be delivered to Congress on March 4, just over one month past the statutory deadline (which requires the President’s budget to be submitted by the first Monday in February),” Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), the top Republican on the Senate Budget Committee, said in a statement.

“This will be the 18th occasion that the Administration has missed an in-law budget deadline,” Sessions added.

The OMB announced last week that the Obama administration would once again fail to comply with budgetary laws.

“Now that Congress has finished its work on this year’s appropriations, the administration is able to finalize next year’s budget,” said OMB spokesman Steve Posner, according to the Washington Examiner. “We are moving to complete the budget as quickly as possible to help Congress return to regular order in the annual budget process.”

Obama’s White House seems to have a serious problem complying with budgetary deadlines set by Congress. In fact, as noted by Sessions’ staff, the Obama administration has missed every deadline to submit a budget since he first took office in 2009.

Further, the White House has “never submitted a plan to control Medicare spending following a Medicare funding warning,” according to the Washington Examiner.

This would appear to be a serious problem considering that the law specifically states that “if there is a Medicare funding warning … made in a year, the president shall submit to Congress, within the 15-day period beginning on the date of the budget submission to Congress under subsection (a) for the succeeding year, proposed legislation to respond to such warning.”

Medicare warnings were issued (and promptly ignored) in 2010, 2011 and 2012.

“Obama’s team has not submitted a final sequestration transparency report, which was due Jan. 21 of this year. They were late submitting the earlier installation of the report,” the Washington Examiner reported. “Obama’s team was also late filing mid-session reviews in 2010, 2011, and 2011. The financial reports on the United States were filed late in 2009, 2011, and 2012.”

In short, the Obama administration seems to be totally incapable of meeting budgetary deadlines put in place by Congress.

Re-blogged from The Blaze

How Many Times Has Obama Violated Budget Deadline Laws? (We Have the Answer)
Becket Adams
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:35:07 GMT

President Obama to Exercise Executive Authority and Raise Minimum Wage…For Fed Contractors

 

President Barack Obama will sign an executive order increasing the minimum wage for federal contractors to $10.10 an hour, the White House announced Tuesday.

President Obama to Exercise Executive Authority and Raise Minimum Wage…For Fed Contractors

In this Jan. 25, 2011 file-pool photo, President Barack Obama delivers his State of the Union address on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo)

The president is expected to announce the increase at Tuesday’s State of the Union address.

The increase from the current national rate of $7.25 will not benefit existing federal contractors. Rather, it will be a benefit enjoyed exclusively by new hires. Further, according to the Associated Press, contract renewals will not be affected by the increase unless “other terms of the agreement change.”

The announced increase is the most recent example of Obama making good on his vow to work around Congress to accomplish specific goals. The increase is also likely the president responding to pressure from far-left groups who have clamored recently for wage increases for low-skilled workers.

“(T)hose who would benefit from the executive order include federally contracted janitors and construction workers as well as workers in military bases who wash dishes, serve food and do laundry,” the AP reported.

However, it’s important to remember that the increase is limited in scope and it will not apply across the board. This will no doubt upset some of the louder proponents of wage increases.

“Still, the issue dovetails with what will be Obama’s broader call for Congress to increase the national minimum wage to $10.10 and tie future increases to inflation,” the report added. “Obama called last year for an increase in the minimum wage to $9.”

Now, although increasing the wage for federal contractors technically does not require congressional authority, Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) said Tuesday that the move “unconstitutional.”

“We have a minimum wage. Congress has set it. For the president to simply declare I’m going to change this law that has passed is unconstitutional,” King said during an interview with CNN.

The president has also thrown his support behind a bill sponsored by Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) and Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.) that calls for a minimum wage increase for tipped workers.

If that particular bill passes, it will mark the first time in nearly two decades that tipped workers have received an increase in minimum wage.

For more information on how TheBlaze is bringing you extensive coverage of the State of the Union address, and how you can watch for free, check out our post on TheBlog.

Re-blogged from The Blaze

President Obama to Exercise Executive Authority and Raise Minimum Wage…For Fed Contractors
Becket Adams
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:52:43 GMT

The Story Behind This Painful Looking X-Ray

Idiot.

A man high on PCP in a state of drug-induced psychosis tried to swallow his cellphone. As one might expect, it didn’t go down smoothly and resulted in this painful looking X-ray.

X-ray phone

Image source: Levy et al. via Internal and Emergency Medicine

The journal Internal and Emergency Medicine describes the patient as a 35-year-old man who tried to gulp down his phone in response to “auditory hallucinations.” When he arrived at the emergency room, the phone could be seen coming out of the top of his throat. Doctors recorded him breathing rapidly in his agitation; he had 24 respirations per minute while the average adult at rest breaths about 12 to 16 times per minute.

Physicians tried to remove the device using forceps at first, but when it wouldn’t budge, they readied an operating room and staff.

“The patient was emergently transported to the OR and ‘double prepped’ for both emergent cricothyrotomy and oropharyngeal intubation,” the case study authors wrote. “The device was successfully removed under procedural sedation without the need for surgical intervention.”

Part of the man’s throat was torn as a result of the foreign object, but the journal article reported that he was treated without requiring further surgery and discharged from the hospital two weeks later.

This isn’t the first time a person high on PCP has swallowed a foreign body. In 2012, a New Jersey man thought to be on the drug bit off his own finger and swallowed it while in jail.

Re-blogged from The Blaze

The Story Behind This Painful Looking X-Ray
Liz Klimas
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:22:03 GMT

Tea Party Favorite Lays Into Obama’s Newest Executive Order in CNN Interview: ‘Unconstitutional,’ ‘Contempt,’ a ‘Violation’

 

Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) on Tuesday slammed President Barack Obama’s plan to sign an executive order increasing the minimum wage for federal contractors to $10.10 an hour, calling the plan a “constitutional violation.”

Tea Party Favorite Lays Into Obamas Newest Executive Order in CNN Interview: Unconstitutional, Contempt, a Violation

In this Oct. 15, 2013 file photo, Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, walks from House Speaker John Boehner’s office with reporters in pursuit on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo) 

Obama is expected to announce the wage increase, the latest example of the White House bypassing Congress to achieve specific goals, at Tuesday’s State of the Union address.

“I think it’s a constitutional violation,” King said during a CNN interview. “We have a minimum wage. Congress has set it. For the president to simply declare ‘I’m going to change this law that Congress has passed,’ is unconstitutional. He’s outside the bounds of his Article II limitations.”

“This threat that the president is going to run the government with an ink pen and executive orders, we’ve never had a president with that level of audacity and that level of contempt for his own oath of office,” King added.

CNN host Chris Cuomo interjected to note that former President Bill Clinton signed far more executive orders than Obama, adding “if you want to stay with your line of reasoning, it could be a little bit of a dangerous game.”

“How invested are you in this, representative, because if he really is abusing his constitutional powers, some might say that’s ground for action against the president, maybe even an impeachable offense. Is that what you’re saying?” Cuomo continued.

“You know, I’ve stayed away from that word, although it does come to me on the streets of America consistently,” King said. “I think instead, this Congress should lay out the violations that the president has had. And there are many.”

Obama knows better, King added.

“It’s Congress’s job to pass the laws. He knows that. And we need to take our oath seriously and defend the Constitution,” he said.

Meanwhile, as King and others railed against the president’s latest executive order, White House chief of staff Denis McDonough told CBS News that “rather than sit and wait for Congress to take action, we’re going to go ahead and roll out on our own, using the president’s authority.”

“Nobody who works full time and works hard at their job should live in poverty. We think $10.10 an hour will allow them to do that,” he said, adding that the White House will “look to work with Congress where we can, but I think as we’ve seen over the last several years now, Congress sometimes is a little slow to action.”

Re-blogged from The Blaze

Tea Party Favorite Lays Into Obama’s Newest Executive Order in CNN Interview: ‘Unconstitutional,’ ‘Contempt,’ a ‘Violation’
Becket Adams
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:43:20 GMT

Monday, January 27, 2014

What Do You Suppose John McCain and George Soros Talked About Between Handshakes and Smiles?

 

There’s no telling what words were exchanged between U.S. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and liberal financier George Soros at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

But you can have a look at some photos of Thursday’s tete-a-tete:

U.S. Sen. John McCain Shakes Hands, Chats With George Soros at World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland

Chairman of Soros Fund Management George Soros, left, talks with U.S. Senator John McCain, right, during the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Thursday, Jan. 23, 2014. (Image source: AP/Michel Euler)

U.S. Sen. John McCain Shakes Hands, Chats With George Soros at World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland

Image source: AP/Michel Euler

What’s the connection between McCain and Soros?

According to The Huffington Post, in an article published during McCain’s 2008 presidential run, Soros funded the McCain’s Reform Institute, a nonpartisan 501c3 organization focused on promoting accountability and transparency in government, while the senator was still with the organization.

The Huffington Post article also referenced two Talking Points Memo reports: One indicated that Soros gave the Reform Institute $150,000; another said Soros’ Open Society Institute in 2002 gave $300,000 in grants to groups defending McCain’s campaign finance law against legal challenges to it.

Interestingly the Huffington Post article initially focuses on McCain’s campaign “aggressively” hitting back at news that Soros was taking part in a $40 million third-party effort to battle Republicans in the fall leading up to the elections.

U.S. Sen. John McCain Shakes Hands, Chats With George Soros at World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland

Image source: Getty Images/AFP/Eric Piermont

Re-blogged from The Blaze

What Do You Suppose John McCain and George Soros Talked About Between Handshakes and Smiles?
Dave Urbanski
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 02:09:39 GMT

Iranian Military Chief Slams John Kerry, Threatens ‘Direct Battle with the U.S.’

 

The head of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard is blasting John Kerry and threatening military action on American soil after the secretary of state last week said “the military option” is still on the table regarding Iran’s nuclear program. This as Iran’s parliament moved to increase its military budget in response to Kerry’s “saber-rattling.”

Iranian Military Chief Slams John Kerry, Threatens ‘Direct Battle with the U.S.’

Iran’s Revolutionary Guard (Photo: AP)

Commander of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) Major General Mohammad Ali Jafari hinted of possible military engagement with the U.S., saying, “Mr. Kerry must know that direct battle with the US is the biggest dream of pious and revolutionary people across the world. Your threats offer our revolutionary people the best opportunity.”

“You could never understand the extent of the invasive capacity of the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Jafari said on Saturday according to the Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA), the official news agency of Iran.

IRNA further wrote, “Jafari recommended Kerry to stop repeating ‘bankrupt strategies like the use of military option’ in order to avoid the accelerated collapse of the US civilization.”

Kerry last week told the Middle East news network Al Arabiya that if Iran does not abide by the agreement with western nations, “then the military option that is available to the United States is ready and prepared to do what it would have to do.”

Iran’s Jafari further said that “wise politicians” should not leave the “ridiculous military option” on the table.

Besides the military commander, Iranian parliament speaker Ali Larijani also lambasted Kerry’s remarks and responded by saying Iran would increase its military budget.

“Today, you heard Kerry’s remarks and saw his saber-rattling against the Islamic Republic of Iran and we should fully understand this sensitivity and take practical measures against it,” Larijani said on Saturday evening.

Iran’s Fars News Agency reported that Iran would increase its military budget in response to what it viewed as a threat from Kerry.

Another senior Revolutionary Guards official, Yadollah Javani, told Fars, “The Islamic Republic can attack all the US interests in the region and they will never be able to show a proportionate reaction.”

“Certainly, the Americans will never succeed in stopping Iran’s nuclear facilities,” he added.

But Ali Akbar Velayati, a senior adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, called Kerry’s words “more like a bluff,” Iran’s Tasnim News Agency reported.

“Obviously, the Americans have no such power (to launch an attack on Iran). If they did, they would not have been expelled from Iraq and Afghanistan in such a totally weakened state,” Velayati added.

Last week, Iran said it was moving a group of warships to the Atlantic Ocean, though no ports of call were announced.

Re-blogged from The Blaze

Iranian Military Chief Slams John Kerry, Threatens ‘Direct Battle with the U.S.’
Sharona Schwartz
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:30:48 GMT

Ohio Officials Do Something With Christian Crosses After Atheists’ Lawsuit Threat That Could Make Them More Visible Than Ever

 

Officials in Stratton, Ohio, were forced to remove crosses that stood for decades on the village’s municipal building after receiving threatening letters from an atheist activist group.

While some local leaders are frustrated by the decision to take the Christian symbols down, the crosses could end up more visible than ever once they are placed in their new locations.

This Is Very Upsetting: Ohio Officials Remove Crosses That Hung for Decades After Atheists Threaten to Sue

Image source: WTOV-TV

The Freedom From Religion Foundation, a church-state separatist organization, first wrote letters to local leaders last year telling them that a lawsuit would result if the crosses remained on government property, The Herald-Star reported.

Mayor John Abdalla at first refused to remove them, but after speaking with the village solicitor, he complied. That said, the mayor isn’t happy about his inevitable decision.

“I don’t like it — not one bit. Worse, I can’t find out who is [behind this],” he told The Herald-Star. “This is very upsetting. Those crosses have been there for years. The [Freedom From Religion Foundation] even sent pictures of the crosses.”

WTOV-TV, though, reported that the crosses may soon be given to local land owners, which will likely make them more prominently displayed than ever on private property in the village.

“That result will be that [the crosses] will be on display actually more visible to the public than they used to be,” said village solicitor Frank Bruzzese.

Abdalla believes a local individual or group complained to The Freedom From Religion Foundation, which is what likely sparked the national activist organization’s interest in the issue.

Cold temperatures have prevented one additional cross from being taken down from the town’s water tower, though the mayor said this will be done once temperatures warm up.

Abdalla said many people in the town are frustrated over the situation.

“It’s all over Facebook, and people are upset about it,” he added.

Re-blogged from The Blaze

Ohio Officials Do Something With Christian Crosses After Atheists’ Lawsuit Threat That Could Make Them More Visible Than Ever
Billy Hallowell
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:59:14 GMT

Sunday, January 26, 2014

Police Identify Gunman in Maryland Mall Shooting

 

COLUMBIA, Md. (AP) — Police have identified the gunman in the Maryland mall shooting as a 19 year old from suburban Washington.

Howard County Police Chief William McMahon said Darion Marcus Aguilar of College Park, Md., arrived at the mall shortly after 10 a.m. on Saturday armed with a Mossburg 12-gauge shotgun and used it to kill two people at a store on the upper level of the Mall of Columbia before killing himself.

McMahon said police are trying to determine whether Aguilar knew either of the victims.

Police Identify Gunman in Maryland Mall Shooting

A Montgomery County, Md., police officer walks in a parking lot at The Mall in Columbia, Saturday, Jan. 25, 2014, in Columbia, Md., following a shooting that police say three people died at the mall including the presumed gunman. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

Police identified the victims as 21-year-old Brianna Benlolo of College Park, Md., and 25-year-old Tyler Johnson of Ellicott City, Md. Both worked at a skateboard shop called Zumiez.

It took hours to identify the shooter since he was carrying ammunition and a backpack and police thought he may have had explosives, McMahon said. When the body was searched, police found crude homemade explosives in the backpack.

“When we originally found the shooter, he still had a lot of ammunition on his person,” McMahon said at a news conference Sunday morning.

McMahon said he didn’t know if Aguilar had a criminal record. No motive has been given for the shooting.

“There are a lot of unanswered questions,” McMahon said.

Very few details were released about Aguilar. He apparently lived with his mother in the suburb of College Park, where University of Maryland is located. McMahon didn’t know if Aguilar was a student there.

According to McMahon, Aguilar purchased the shotgun last month at a shop in neighboring Montgomery County.

Aguilar took a taxi to the mall and roamed its halls before shots rang out within an hour. Police arrived at the scene just 2 minutes after a 911 call came into authorities at 11:15 a.m. When they arrived, they found three bodies at the Zumiez skateboard shop on the upper level.

Five others were injured in the midmorning shooting and its aftermath. All had been released from hospitals by Saturday evening. Only one person was injured by gunfire.

“This was a very scary incident,” Howard County Executive Ken Ulman said. “There were a lot of people very close to where this happened.”

Earlier, McMahon praised mall patrons for doing the right thing by sheltering in place and not stampeding toward the exits.

“We actually have drilled on this in the past and that experience has been very beneficial to us,” McMahon said Saturday.

A news release Saturday night said police found and disabled “two crude devices that appeared to be an attempt at making explosives using fireworks.” Police were searching the mall with dogs overnight, which is standard procedure, and the mall was to remain closed through Tuesday.

Joan Harding of Elkridge, Md., was shopping with her husband, David, for a tiara for their granddaughter’s 18th birthday. She said she heard something heavy falling, followed by gunshots and people running.

“My husband said, ‘Get down!’ and the girl that worked in the store said, ‘Get in the back,’” Harding said. That is where they hid until police searched the mall and signaled it was safe to leave.

“My husband said, ‘Get down!’ and the girl that worked in the store said, ‘Get in the back.’”

Share:

The shooting took place around 11:15 a.m. Saturday at a shop called Zumiez, which sells skateboards, clothing and accessories. The company’s chief executive, Rick Brooks, said it was making counseling available for employees in the area.

McMahon said at a news conference that authorities had difficulty identifying the gunman because of concerns he was carrying explosives and were proceeding with an “abundance of caution.” By late Saturday, police said they had tentatively identified the gunman but declined to release his name while they followed up on leads.

Police Identify Gunman in Maryland Mall Shooting

Police talk on the scene after a shooting at The Mall in Columbia on Saturday, Jan. 25, 2014 in Columbia, Md. Police say three people died at the mall including the presumed gunman. (AP Photo/ Evan Vucci)

Police identified the victims as 21-year-old Brianna Benlolo of College Park, Md., and 25-year-old Tyler Johnson of Ellicott City, Md. Both worked at Zumiez.

Benlolo’s grandfather, John Feins, said in a telephone interview from Florida that his granddaughter had a 2-year-old son and that the job at Zumiez was her first since she went back to work after her son’s birth.

“She was all excited because she was the manager there,” he said.

He said he had spoken with his daughter, Brianna’s mother, earlier in the day, but didn’t know who the gunman was or whether the person knew his granddaughter.

“It’s senseless. It’s totally, totally senseless,” he said.

He described his daughter’s family as a military family that had moved frequently and had been in Colorado before moving to Maryland about two years ago. He said his granddaughter was on good terms with her son’s father, and they shared custody.

“I mean what can you say? You go to work and make a dollar and you got some idiot coming in and blowing people away,” he said.

The mall is at the center of the town that’s a suburb of both Baltimore and Washington, and it typically opens at 10 a.m. on Saturdays. It was busy with shoppers and employees when the shots rang out before noon.

Tonya Broughton of Silver Spring, Md., was with a friend getting facials for a “girls’ morning out,” she said. “The only thing I heard was all the people running and screaming and saying ‘There’s a shooter! There’s a shooter!’” she said.

Wearing a gel face mask, she and her friend hid in a Victoria’s Secret store, as her anxious thoughts turned to her family.

People were directed out of the mall and into a parking lot, where some boarded a bus and others walked toward their cars. Police cars blocked off various entrances to the mall as SWAT officers and law enforcement vehicles gathered in the expansive parking lot. Some people were seen crying and hugging and at least one woman was carrying a baby. Detectives interviewed witnesses as they emerged from the mall.

Laura McKindles of Columbia works at a kiosk in the mall. She said she heard between eight and 10 gunshots, followed by people running and screaming. She ran into the backroom of a perfume store and locked the door.

Allison Cohen, who works at the apparel store Lucky Brand Jeans, said she always felt safe at the mall.

“I truly never thought something like this would ever happen here,” Cohen said. “It’s really, really shocking.”

Re-blogged from The Blaze

Police Identify Gunman in Maryland Mall Shooting
Associated Press
Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:45:45 GMT

Saturday, January 25, 2014

9 Violent Criminals Who Paid Less for Bail Than ’2016′ Filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza

 

On Friday, conservative scholar Dinesh D’Souza pleaded not guilty to charges that he violated campaign finance laws. The filmmaker behind the anti-Obama documentary “2016: Obama’s America” was released on $500,000 bond, which some — even in the legal community — argue was excessive.

We looked into these claims and uncovered a number of violent and disturbing offenses that resulted in bail amounts less than D’Souza was required to put up. While it’s not a comprehensive list by any means, here are nine cases where violent suspects had to put up less for bail than D’Souza:

A former convict accused of robbing 4 people and raping one of them

In 2007, a Chicago judge set bail for former convict Darnell Richmond at $400,000 on charges that he robbed or attempted to rob four people, raping one of them, just three months after he was released from prison, the Chicago Tribune reports.

That was after Richmond’s bail was increased from $150,000, when he was accused of only two counts of attempted robbery. He was later indicted for additional attempted robbery charges and sexual assault.

A man accused of trying to kill a police officer

Bail for a man in Puna, Hawaii, accused of trying to murder a police officer was reset to $400,000 in December 2013 after several missing affidavits relating to the case were found.

When the probable-cause documents known as Riverside affidavits first went missing, a judge told prosecutors that suspect Joseph Feliciano’s bail would have to be reduced from $558,000 to $25,000. When the missing documents were located his bail was increased to $400,000.

A man accused of holding elderly men in a “dungeon”

In July of 2013, a Houston man accused of holding a group of elderly men captive in what was described as a “prison room” or “dungeon” was held in a Harris County jail in lieu of $400,000 bail.

Houston police arrived at suspect Walter Renard Jones’ house to find the prisoners living in “deplorable conditions.” Jones previously faced charges for marijuana possession, theft and failure to register as a sex offender.

A man accused of attempted murder

In January of this year, police arrested Joseph Boyd, 28, who allegedly tried to gun down an unidentified victim in Camden, N.J. The man’s victim reportedly suffered wounds to his hand and hip.

He was booked at Camden County Jail in lieu of $400,000 bail, cash or bond.

A 42-year-old man charged with sexually assaulting a teen

In January 2014, 42-year-old Barry Eltman was arrested and charged with aggravated sexual assault and endangering the welfare of a child.

Accused of sexually assaulting a 15-year-old family member, his bail was set at $450,000.

A man accused of raping his adult sister

On Jan. 17, the Democrat-Herald reported that 46-year-old Timothy Wayne Maine was booked on charges of first-degree rape, incest, first-degree sexual abuse, coercion and attempted sodomy.

He was held on $450,000 bond.

A man who robbed a woman and then raped her twice behind a container

In December of 2013, a judge in Cook County, Ill., set bail at $400,000 for a man accused of robbing a woman and then raping her twice behind a large container.

Devonte Willis, 30, was reportedly armed at the time of the alleged assault and asked the woman what she was willing to do to save her life.

A man accused of felony child abuse on his own newborn child

Police in Smithfield, N.C., arrived at the home of Jon Michael Jones, 22, to find his newborn baby unconscious and not breathing. Officers were able to perform life-saving measures until paramedics arrived.

In December 2013, Jones was arrested and charged with one count of intentional child abuse and inflicting serious injury. His bail was set at $400,000.

A man charged with multiple counts of rape

On Wednesday, WHNT-TV reported Gaspar Perez-Bartolo, 26, of Russellville, Ala., was arrested for allegedly breaking into a home and attempting to rape a 12-year-old girl. New information obtained by police later led to two additional rape charges.

He was held at the Franklin County Detention Center on $350,000 bail.

Re-blogged from The Blaze

9 Violent Criminals Who Paid Less for Bail Than ’2016′ Filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza
Jason Howerton
Sat, 25 Jan 2014 13:00:25 GMT

Feds Reportedly Investigating Whether Dennis Rodman Violated Sanctions Against North Korea

 

Federal authorities are reportedly investigating whether or not former NBA player Dennis Rodman violated sanctions against North Korea when he took gifts for the communist country’s dictator during his most recent visit.

Feds Reportedly Investigating Whether Dennis Rodman Violated Sanctions Against North Korea

Former U.S. basketball player Dennis Rodman talks to the media upon arriving at Beijing International Airport from North Korea on January 13, 2014. (Wang Zhao/AFP/Getty Images)

According to The Daily Beast, an official said the U.S. Treasury Department, in consultation with the Department of State, is looking to see if he broke a law that forbids the importing of goods into North Korea.

“The Department is aware of the media allegations that Dennis Rodman may have transported luxury goods to North Korea. Our regulations require a license for the export or reexport to North Korea of all U.S.-origin items except food and certain medicines,” Eugene Cottilli, spokesman for the Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security, told The Daily Beast. “We do not comment on possible or pending investigations. We have no further comment at this time.”

“We do not comment on possible or pending investigations.”

Share:

Rodman recently took a team of basketball players to the communist country, in celebration of Kim Jong Un’s birthday. The former NBA player gave Un more than $10,000 in gifts, including a fur coat and Italian suit, The Weekly Standard reported.

Additionally, Rodman also may have taken several bottles of his newly launched “Bad Ass Vodka” for the North Korean dictator — which is included in the federal government’s definition of “luxary goods,” according to Fox News.

Re-blogged from The Blaze

Feds Reportedly Investigating Whether Dennis Rodman Violated Sanctions Against North Korea
Oliver Darcy
Sat, 25 Jan 2014 14:04:07 GMT

Friday, January 24, 2014

Senate GOP Aide Arrested on Child Porn Charges Found Dead of Suspected Suicide

 

A former aide to U.S. Sen. Lamar Alexander has been found dead in Maryland, just weeks after the former staffer’s arrest on child pornography charges.

Senate GOP Aide Arrested on Child Porn Charges Found Dead of Suspected Suicide

In this Wednesday, Dec. 11, 2013 file image taken from video and released by WJLA TV, U.S. Postal police walk with Ryan Loskarn, center, in Washington. Loskarn, the fired chief of staff for Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, was found dead Thursday after his arrest last month on charges of possession and attempted distribution of child pornography. (AP/WJLA TV, File)

The Carroll County Sheriff’s office said on its website Friday that Ryan Loskarn was found dead Thursday in Sykesville, Md. Deputies say the preliminary investigation shows Loskarn may have committed suicide.

Loskarn had been allowed to live with his parents while he awaited trial on charges of possession and attempted distribution of child pornography.

The 35-year-old also was required to be electronically monitored while living with his parents.

Loskarn had been the chief of staff for Alexander, a Republican from Tennessee, for two years before his arrest. Loskarn was fired immediately after his arrest.

Re-blogged from The Blaze

Senate GOP Aide Arrested on Child Porn Charges Found Dead of Suspected Suicide
Associated Press
Fri, 24 Jan 2014 17:30:19 GMT

Congress grants Obama 'free rein for martial law'

 

America officially became a police state on Dec. 19, 2013, according to critics of the 2014 National Defense Authorization Act. The bill was fast-tracked through the U.S. Senate, with no time for discussion or amendments, while most Americans were distracted by the scandal surrounding A&E’s troubles with “Duck Dynasty” star Phil Robertson. Eighty-five of 100 senators votedto renew President Obama’s power to seize U.S. citizens, strip them of due process and hold them indefinitely in military facilities, denying them of their fundamental right to due process. The new version of the NDAA had already been quietly passed by the House of Representatives. Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Chris Hedges filed a lawsuit in 2012 against the Obama administration to challenge the legality of an earlier version of the NDAA. Now, several of the nation’s most-respected legal teams are asking the Supreme Court to take up the Hedges case challenging the indefinite detention provisions of the NDAA because without review, the framework is in place for a police state. Sections of the bill are written so broadly that critics say they could encompass journalists who report on terror-related issues, such as Hedges, for supporting enemy forces.

Journalist Chris Hedges, who is suing the government over a controversial provision in the National Defense Authorization Act, is seen here addressing a crowd in New York's Zuccotti Park.

“The central question now before this court is whether the federal judiciary will stand idly by while Congress and the president establish the legal framework for the establishment of a police state and the subjugation of the American citizenry through the threat of indefinite military arrest and detention, without the right to counsel, the right to confront one’s accusers, or the right to trial.” That’s from an amicus brief in the Hedges case submitted to the Supreme Court by attorneys with the U.S. Justice Foundation of Ramona, Calif., Friedman Harfenist Kraut & Perlstein of Lake Success, N.Y., and William J. Olson, P.C. of Vienna, Va. The attorneys are Michael Connelly, Steven J. Harfenist, William J. Olson, Herbert W. Titus, John S. Miles, Jeremiah L. Morgan and Robert J. Olson. They are adding their voices to the chorus asking the Supreme Court to overturn the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which said the plaintiffs simply didn’t have standing to challenge the law adopted by Congress. The amicus brief is on behalf of U.S. Rep. Steve Stockman, Virginia Delegate Bob Marshall, Virginia Sen. Dick Black, the U.S. Justice Foundation, Gun Owners Foundation, Gun Owners of America, Center for Media & Democracy, Downsize DC Foundation, Downsize DC.org, Free Speech Defense & Education Fund, Free Speech Coalition, Western Journalism Center, The Lincoln Institute, Institute on the Constitution, Abraham Lincoln Foundation and Conservative Legal Defense & Education Fund. Its Section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA, and its successors, that drew a lawsuit by Hedges, Daniel Ellsberg, Jennifer Bolen, Noam Chomsky, Alex O’Brien, Kai Warg All, Brigitta Jonsottir and the group U.S. Day of Rage. Many of the plaintiffs are authors or reporters who stated that the threat of indefinite detention by the U.S. military already had altered their activities. “It’s clearly unconstitutional,” Hedges says of the bill. “It is a huge and egregious assault against our democracy. It overturns over 200 years of law, which has kept the military out of domestic policing.” Hedges is a former foreign correspondent for the New York Times and was part of a team of reporters awarded a Pulitzer Prize in 2002 for the paper’s coverage of global terrorism. The amicus brief warns the precedent right now “leaves American citizens vulnerable to arrest and detention, without the protection of the Bill of Rights, under either the plaintiff’s or the government’s theory of the case. The judiciary must not await subsequent litigation to resolve this issue, as the nature of military detention is that American citizens then would have no adequate legal remedy.” Video mania: The instruction manual on how to restore America to what it once was: “Taking America Back” on DVD. This package also includes the “Tea Party at Sea” DVD. Section 1021 allows the detention of anyone, including American citizens, by the military, if the president considers that person to have help with terror. And it’s different from the Authorization for the Use of Military Force, which was adopted immediately after the 9/11 terror attacks, because while that allows detention, there must be something linking them to the 9/11 attacks. “Section 1021 authorizes detention, potentially forever, and even rendition of American citizens to foreign nations,” the brief points out. “If this court refuses to hear the Hedges challenge, it will leave American citizens subject to unconstitutional military arrest and detention.” “If this court does not grant the petition, there is no reason to believe the U.S. presidents would cease to assert ‘the right to place certain individuals [including American citizens] in military detention, without trial.’ There would continue to be no statutory constraint on an arrest being authorized by a military officer of unspecified rank. There would be no protection provided by the requirement of a grand jury indictment. There would be no requirement of an arrest arrant issued by an Article II judge supported by a sworn affidavit showing probable cause of the commission of a specific crime. Neither would there be any protection against use of compelled testimony, or against an violation of due process of law. There would be no civilian proceedings whatsoever against the person detained. Indeed, there is no requirement that the individual being detained has committed any federal crime, and military detentions could be used to circumvent the protections afforded American citizens by the treason clause of the U.S. Constitution.” It describes a scary scenario. “After the string of black Sububans pulls away, it is difficult to believe that the military would provide relatives or lawyers with any information whatsoever as to where the person being detained was being held.” After all, it explains, Congress specifically expressed its desire for the detention provision to apply to American citizens even on American soil by rejecting multiple amendments that would have exempted them. And Obama, also, affirmed the detention authority, stating, “I want to clarify that my administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens … My administration will interpret Section 1021 in a manner that ensures that any detention it authorizes complies with the Constitution, the laws of war, and all other applicable law.” Simply stating that means it could be interpreted in a contrary manner. At the trial court level, U.S. District Judge Katherine B. Forrest issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order that struck the provision as unconstitutional. Multiple states have passed state laws banning its enforcement inside those states, and Herb Titus, a constitutional expert, previously told WND Forrest’s ruling underscored “the arrogance of the current regime, in that they will not answer questions that they ought to answer to a judge because they don’t think they have to.” The judge explained that the plaintiffs alleged paragraph 1021 is “constitutionally infirm, violating both their free speech and associational rights guaranteed by the 1st Amendment as well due process rights guaranteed by the 5th Amendment.” She noted the government “did not call any witnesses, submit any documentary evidence or file any declarations.” “It must be said that it would have been a rather simple matter for the government to have stated that as to these plaintiffs and the conduct as to which they would testify, that [paragraph] 1021 did not and would not apply, if indeed it did or would not,” she wrote. Instead, the administration only responded with, “I’m not authorized to make specific representations regarding specific people.” “The court’s attempt to avoid having to deal with the constitutional aspects of the challenge was by providing the government with prompt notice in the form of declarations and depositions of the … conduct in which plaintiffs are involved and which they claim places them in fear of military detention,” she wrote. “To put it bluntly, to eliminate these plaintiffs’ standing simply by representing that their conduct does not fall within the scope of 1021 would have been simple. The government chose not to do so – thereby ensuring standing and requiring this court to reach the merits of the instant motion. “Plaintiffs have stated a more than plausible claim that the statute inappropriately encroaches on their rights under the 1st Amendment,” she wrote. Experts have expressed concern that even a journalist who has interviewed a member of a terror group may be considered to have rendered aid to that group. The government appealed the trial judge’s ruling to the 2nd Circuit, which abruptly ruled that the plaintiffs had no right to challenge the law. In the following interview, Hedges, early in the case, describes what he sees developing.

Re-blogged from WND

Congress grants Obama 'free rein for martial law'
Bob Unruh
Fri, 24 Jan 2014 15:39:25 GMT

John Boehner: Sometimes I Have to Be the ‘Gestapo’

 

House Speaker John Boehner said he sometimes has to be “the Gestapo,” the secret police of Nazi Germany, to do his job.

John Boehner: Sometimes I Have to Be the Gestapo

Image source: NBC

“People think, all right, you’re the speaker, you’re the leader,” Boehner said on “The Tonight Show with Jay Leno” Thursday. “They don’t realize I’ve got a lot of other roles that I play. You know, some members, I have to be the big brother figure. Some I have to be the father figure. Others I have to be the dean of students or the principal. Some of them I have to be the Gestapo.”

The Ohio Republican discussed his upbringing as one of 12 kids and how working in his father’s bar — and learning to deal with “every jackass that walks in the door” — has served him well.

“I tell people all the skills I need to do my job, I learned growing up. I grew up in a big family — have to learn to get along with each other, get things done together … you grow up around a bar — I mopped floors, did dishes, waited tables, tended bar. And you have to learn to deal with every jackass that walks in the door,” Boehner said, before emphasizing: “Now trust me, I need all the skills I learned growing up to do my job.”

Re-blogged from The Blaze

John Boehner: Sometimes I Have to Be the ‘Gestapo’
Madeleine Morgenstern
Fri, 24 Jan 2014 14:21:44 GMT

Thursday, January 23, 2014

‘Shameful’: Sen. Ted Cruz Condemns the State of Investigations Into IRS Scandal

 

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz (R) on Thursday condemned how the investigations into the Internal Revenue Service scandal are proceeding, calling it “shameful” that there are still so few answers about who was responsible, and that no one has been held accountable.

Speaking on Glenn Beck’s radio program, Cruz remarked: “This week … I sent a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder pointing out that it’s now been eight months since the Department of Treasury Inspector General concluded the IRS had improperly targeted conservative and Tea Party groups. The day that news broke, President Obama told the country he was outraged … Eric Holder said that day that he was outraged, and was going to start an investigation.”

“In the eight months that’s followed, not a single person has been indicted,” Cruz continued. “It’s been publicly reported [that] the FBI doesn’t plan to bring charges against anybody … and now we’ve discovered the person leading the investigation at the Department of Justice is a partisan Democrat who has given over $6,000 to President Obama and the Democrats. This is shameful.”

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz Says IRS Investigations Are Shameful

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz calls in to the Glenn Beck Radio Program Jan. 23, 2014. (Photo: TheBlaze TV)

Cruz said that rather than having hearings where lawmakers have a few minutes each and “one question doesn’t connect to the next,” a select committee should be formed to investigate the targeting of conservative groups. Rather than simply draw attention to issues, Cruz said that under the leadership of an experienced prosecutor, a select committee would actually get some answers. Instead of simply asking what the former head of the IRS was doing at the White House a reported 157 times, Cruz said, a select committee would come in and say, “we’re going to walk through all 157 times. I want to see your notes. I want to see your agendas, I want to see who was there. We’re going to talk about what was discussed at each one of those meetings.”

Cruz warned that we’ve got to be “much, much more effective in ensuring that the machinery of government is not used against the citizenry, and against the president’s perceived political enemies.”

Beck also asked the senator whether he has any presidential ambitions, but Cruz remained non-committal.

“Every person who might be thinking about it — the path that they ought to follow is to stand up and help lead the fight,” Cruz said.

Re-blogged from The Blaze

‘Shameful’: Sen. Ted Cruz Condemns the State of Investigations Into IRS Scandal
Erica Ritz
Thu, 23 Jan 2014 21:22:27 GMT

Wendy Davis Supporters Caught on Video Making ‘Abhorrent’ Comments About Paraplegic Opponent

 

A video released Thursday by a conservative activist group shows what appears to be volunteers for Texas gubernatorial candidate Wendy Davis mocking Republican contender Greg Abbott for being a paraplegic.

“I’m wondering how this is going to work out, because he’s in a wheelchair and most of the slogans are ‘Stand With Wendy,’” a Davis supporter who is associated with Battleground Texas, an activist group comprised mostly of leftover Obama campaign volunteers, can be heard saying in a highly-edited video released by Project Veritas.

“What I think is interesting is he’s in a wheelchair but he has no sympathy for anyone or any way. He may have a personality disorder,” another volunteer added.

The video also captures questionable comments made by pro-Davis volunteers during an Austin Democratic group meeting.

“He doesn’t speak well, he isn’t good looking, he doesn’t have a good personality, and he’s in a wheelchair [emphasis added],” a Davis supporter said at the meeting.

Soon after the video was released Thursday, Bo Delp, Davis’ communications director, attacked Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe for smearing the Democratic state senator with one of his “trademark deceptive videos.”

“O’Keefe is trying to create the impression that Wendy Davis attended this meeting and condones the language in this video,” Phillips said.

Davis, however, lost no time distancing herself from the video and condemned the remarks as “abhorrent.”

“Greg Abbott has persevered through great personal challenge to raise a family, have a productive career, and for that he deserves our respect,” she said in a prepared statement.

Now, it’s important to note that the above video presents only a quick glimpse into what was said about Abbott. That is, we aren’t getting the full context of those conversations.

“This is a conversation that anyone strategizing to elect Davis was going to have, just as the Abbott campaign was going to strategize (hopefully without cameras in the room) about how to run against a woman without making gaffes,” Slate’s Dave Weigel suggests. “’Stand With [name of candidate]’ is a common frame, used by Marco Rubio — only natural, isn’t it, to wonder if it looks cruel when the opponent can’t walk?”

This is certainly a point worth considering.

Maybe the remarks captured on tape were cruel jokes made at Abbott’s expense. Maybe they weren’t. In any case, Davis’ campaign is already in trouble thanks to recent revelations about her real past — and this Project Veritas video isn’t going to do her any favors.

Re-blogged from The Blaze

Wendy Davis Supporters Caught on Video Making ‘Abhorrent’ Comments About Paraplegic Opponent
Becket Adams
Thu, 23 Jan 2014 21:49:57 GMT

New Court Documents Allege Tim Geithner Said Some Pretty Ominous Things to S&P After the 2011 Downgrade

 

Standard and Poor’s in 2011 stripped the United States of its “triple-A” rating, leading to what appears to be some serious friction between the credit rating agency and the U.S. Treasury Department, according to recent legal filings.

New Court Documents Allege Tim Geithner Said Some Pretty Ominous Things to S&P After the 2011 Downgrade: Huge Error

President Obama greets Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner after the State of the Union address Jan. 24, 2012 (Getty Images)

McGraw Hill Financial Inc., S&P’s parent company, in an affidavit filed this week said former U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner “angrily chastised” S&P after the U.S. was downgraded to an “AA-plus” rating.

Court documents allege Geithner at one point warned McGraw Hill Financial chairman Harold McGraw that he would be held “accountable” for a supposed “huge error” on S&P’s part.

“S&P’s conduct would be looked at very carefully,” Geithner allegedly told McGraw three days after the downgrade, according to documents made available to TheBlaze. “Such behavior would not occur…without a response from the government.”

Here’s the exact wording from the court document:

[I]n August 2011, Chief Executive Officer and President of McGraw Hill, Harold McGraw III. Mr. McGraw describes personal communications made to him first on behalf of the Secretary of the Treasury, and then personally by the Secretary himself in the days following the downgrade. The Treasury Secretary angrily chastised S&P for the downgrade, stating that S&P’s conduct would be “looked at very carefully” and that such behavior could not occur without a response from the United States.

[…]

This was followed on Monday by a call to Mr. McGraw from the Secretary of the Treasury, Timothy Geithner, in which Secretary Geithner stated that S&P had made a “huge error” for which it was “accountable.” He said that S&P had done “an enormous disservice to yourselves and your country…”

The affidavit adds that McGraw reportedly learned of Geithner’s initials remarks not from Geithner, but from a former agent at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York – the same Fed bank where the former Treasury Secretary had been president in 2008.

The legal filings this week come in response to a $5 billion civil fraud lawsuit the federal government brought against the credit rating agency shortly after the downgrade.

The federal government alleges in its lawsuit that S&P inflated its ratings so it could win more fees from issuers.  However, S&P maintains that the civil fraud lawsuit is about payback for the downgrade. The affidavit this week is an attempt by S&P to have the federal government turn over documents it hopes will prove this claim.

U.S. officials absolutely deny this charge.

“The allegation that former Secretary Geithner threatened or took any action to prompt retaliatory government action against S&P is false,” Jenni LeCompte, a spokeswoman for Geithner, told Businessweek in a statement.

S&P in a statement to TheBlaze defended its decision to file the declaration this week.

“We are simply asking the court to order the government to provide the discovery S&P is entitled to so it can properly defend itself against these meritless claims,” Ed Sweeney, a spokesman for New York-based S&P told TheBlaze in a prepared statement. “S&P reviewed the same subprime mortgage data as the rest of the market including U.S. Government officials who publicly stated that problems in the subprime market appeared to be contained.”

“Additionally, S&P’s ratings on the CDOs in question were substantially the same as those provided by the other rating agencies, yet the government has chosen to charge just S&P,” his statement added.

Sweeney declined to comment any further on the story.

Re-blogged from The Blaze

New Court Documents Allege Tim Geithner Said Some Pretty Ominous Things to S&P After the 2011 Downgrade
Becket Adams
Fri, 24 Jan 2014 00:36:48 GMT

Maker of Highly Successful Anti-Obama Documentary Indicted for Allegedly Violating U.S. Election Law

 

Dinesh DSouza Indicted for Allegedly Violating U.S. Election Law

Dinesh D’Souza during a radio interview. Photo Credit: www.christianitytoday.com

NEW YORK (TheBlaze/AP) — A conservative scholar and author known recently for his critical works on President Barack Obama has been indicted in New York on charges he violated campaign finance laws.

Federal prosecutors announced the charges Thursday against Dinesh D’Souza, who made the anti-Obama documentary “2016: Obama’s America.” They say he’ll be arraigned Friday on charges he directed $20,000 in illegal contributions to be made in the New York Senate race in 2012. The funds allegedly headed to the Wendy Long campaign, who unsuccessfully ran for Hillary Clinton’s U.S. Senate seat.

D’Souza found out he was being investigated by the feds in the mid-2013, months after his anti-Obama documentary earned roughly $33 million at the box office, according to the Hollywood Reporter. The film went on to become the second most popular political documentary in U.S. history.

Prosecutors say the San Diego resident was charged with causing the illegal campaign contributions to be made and causing false statements to be made in connection with them. They say the criminal case resulted from a routine review by the FBI of campaign filings by various candidates after the Senate race.

A defense attorney says D’Souza didn’t act with any corrupt or criminal intent.

But Gerald Molen, a co-producer of “2016,” told THR that the charges are politically motivated.

“In America, we have a long tradition of not doing what is commonly done in too many other countries — criminalizing dissent through the selective enforcement of the law,” he said.

The producer argues it’s obvious that D’Souza is being singled-out over an “an alleged minor violation.” He also connected what he believes to be political targeting in this case to the targeting done by the IRS.

“In light of the recent events and the way the IRS has been used to stifle dissent, this arrest should send shivers down the spines of all freedom-loving Americans,” Molen added.

Re-blogged from The Blaze

 

Maker of Highly Successful Anti-Obama Documentary Indicted for Allegedly Violating U.S. Election Law
Associated Press
Thu, 23 Jan 2014 23:55:39 GMT

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Florida Republican in Deep Trouble for Agreeing President Obama Should Be Hanged for Treason

 

A Republican candidate for the Florida House of Representatives is in hot water after he agreed Monday that President Barack Obama should be hanged for treason.

Joshua Black, an African-American, agreed to the idea of hanging the president after a Twitter user sent him the following public message: “I’m past impeachment. It’s time to arrest and hang him high.”

“Agreed,” Black tweeted in response.

Fla. GOP House Candidate in Deep Trouble for Saying President Obama Should Be Hanged

Image source: Twitter.

A Republican candidate for the Florida House in a nearby district, Chris Latvala, was quick to denounce Black.

“[Y]ou aren’t seriously calling for the killing of Obama are you?” Latvala asked, adding that Black is an “embarrassment.”

Fla. GOP House Candidate in Deep Trouble for Saying President Obama Should Be Hanged

Image source: Twitter.

Black remained defiant, explaining that Obama could only be executed after he has stood trial.

Fla. GOP House Candidate in Deep Trouble for Saying President Obama Should Be Hanged

Image source: Twitter.

Fla. GOP House Candidate in Deep Trouble for Saying President Obama Should Be Hanged

Image source: Twitter.

Black then took to Facebook to explain himself:

Fla. GOP House Candidate in Deep Trouble for Saying President Obama Should Be Hanged

Image source: Facebook.

It wasn’t long before the local GOP chairman, Michael Guju, Republican Gov. Rick Scott and others joined Latvala in calling on Black to abandon his bid for congress.

“It is impossible to accept this statement,” Guju said. “This is wholly unacceptable and unduly provocative.”

“Joshua Black’s comments on President Barack Obama are outrageous,” Gov. Scott tweeted Tuesday. “Floridians expect more from our leaders and he should immediately withdraw his candidacy to represent families of Pinellas County.”

Black resigned Tuesday from a liaison position with the Pinellas County Republican Executive Committee, according to WTSP-TV. But he said he would not drop out of the race.

Republican Party of Florida Chairman Lenny Curry condemned Black’s tweet: “That garbage does not represent the values of the people I know whether R, D or I.”

Black said Tuesday that he has been paid a visit by the United States Secret Service.

Re-blogged from The Blaze

Florida Republican in Deep Trouble for Agreeing President Obama Should Be Hanged for Treason
Becket Adams
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:00:28 GMT

States Taking Steps to Crack Down on Fraud From Obamacare ‘Navigators’

 

After a congressional investigation found troubling information about the people hired to sign consumers up for Obamacare plans, state lawmakers are taking action to prevent fraud and identity theft.

States Taking Steps to Crack Down on Fraud From Obamacare Navigators

Soldiers walk in front of a stage at the Virginia State Capitol in Richmond, Va. Virginia is among states considering stricter background checks of Obamacare navigators. (AP/Patrick Semansky

Last week, bills were introduced by state legislatures in Arizona, Colorado and Virginia to subject all Obamacare “navigators” to beefed-up background checks eliminating anyone convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor involving fraud. State legislatures in South Carolina and Louisiana are also considering similar legislation, according to the Goldwater Institute, a conservative think tank that has monitored the matter.

“Having worked as a doctor for over 30 years, I believe that patient privacy is of paramount importance,” Colorado state Rep. Janak Joshi (R) said in a statement. “It’s outrageous that the government officials we trust to keep us safe would move forward with a program that lacks the most basic protections for Americans’ privacy.”

Navigators have access to Social Security numbers, health information and financial information of consumers they sign up for Obamacare insurance policies.

The report released last month by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee found several instances of problems plaguing the navigators. Among those:

• In North Carolina, a navigator grantee organization violated the rules for mailing documents on behalf of consumers.

• Navigators in Dallas were caught on video encouraging applicants to lie on their health insurance applications so the applicants could qualify for tax subsidies.

• Navigators were caught telling an applicant to lie about her smoking habit to get lower cost insurance. Another navigator gave a TV interview and told viewers that applicants’ credit scores would impact their eligibility, which was inaccurate.

More than 120 navigator grants have been issued in 34 states. Many have gone to liberal groups with ties to the organization once known as ACORN, according to the Goldwater Institute, including Southern United Neighborhoods and Structured Employment Economic Development Corporation.

As many as 31 states do not require background checks, according to a survey by the National Academy for State Health Policy.

National Review reported that in Connecticut, one navigators convicted of a class-B felony was permitted to work, while in New Mexico one in seven certified navigators is on the FBI’s criminal database. New Mexico caught and stopped several would-be-navigators charged with serious financial crimes, National Review reported, while 21 navigators applicants in Connecticut were flagged in background checks.

Re-blogged from The Blaze

States Taking Steps to Crack Down on Fraud From Obamacare ‘Navigators’
Fred Lucas
Wed, 22 Jan 2014 04:59:03 GMT

Mysterious Anti-Semitic Fliers Emerge in Oakland

 

Anti-Semitic fliers showing a swastika drawn on a Jewish councilwoman’s forehead were found plastered in Oakland, Calif., over the weekend.

Posted throughout the Montclair district, an area represented by Councilwoman Libby Schaaf, the fliers read “Stop Schaaf. Stop the DAC.” A black and white image of the politician with the symbol on her head accompanied the text.

According to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, DAC is an acronym for “domain awareness center,” a controversial government surveillance initiative planned by Oakland officials.

“As a person of Jewish heritage I found this particularly hurtful. As an Oaklander I found it shameful,” Schaaf told the Contra Costa Times. “I have throughout the project expressed serious concern. So I am surprised that I have been targeted with this particular issue.”

Schaaf, who is set to run for mayor in November, has been critical of the project, though she ultimately voted in favor of its approval.

The domain awareness center — an effort to possibly link cameras from around the city to collect data using license plate readers, social media feeds and other tools — is set to be operational in July 2014. The stated goal is to provide an around-the-clock mechanism for monitoring and responding to emergencies in Oakland, according to the Oakland North news project at the University of California, Berkeley.

Proponents say the center will help authorities solve crimes and keep citizens safe, but opponents cite privacy concerns.

KGO-TV reported that police are looking into the fliers to assess whether they should be considered hate speech.

Re-blogged from The Blaze

Mysterious Anti-Semitic Fliers Emerge in Oakland
Billy Hallowell
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:36:04 GMT

Michelle Obama’s Faces in Her Latest ‘Let’s Move’ Video Are Priceless

She looks like she needs a banana…not an apple

First lady Michelle Obama in a video released Tuesday looked like she was having the time of her life hanging out with the Miami Heat, last year’s NBA world champions.

Featuring NBA stars LeBron James, Dwyane Wade, Chris Bosh, Ray Allen and coach Erik Spoelstra, the video, which was produced by the first lady’s anti-obesity “Let’s Move” campaign, focuses on the benefits of healthy eating and drinking water.

And, again, the first lady looked like she was really having a terrific time (we mean that):

Michelle Obamas Faces in Her Latest Lets Move Video Are Priceless

Mrs. Obama looks boisterous. The Heat’s LeBron James looks intimidated (image source: YoutTube)

Michelle Obamas Faces in Her Latest Lets Move Video Are Priceless

Of course the video about eating healthy includes the first lady … eating healthy (image source: YouTube)

Michelle Obamas Faces in Her Latest Lets Move Video Are Priceless

We presume that’s the first lady’s game face (image source: YouTube)

Michelle Obamas Faces in Her Latest Lets Move Video Are Priceless

Okay, maybe she doesn’t look thrilled here — but she still gives a pretty mean side-eye (image source: YouTube)

The Heat visited the White House last week where there were honored by President Barack Obama for being winning the world championship last year.

Re-blogged from The Blaze

Michelle Obama’s Faces in Her Latest ‘Let’s Move’ Video Are Priceless
Becket Adams
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 20:11:07 GMT

Two Children, One Man Found Dead at Fort Hood

 

Two children and a man were found dead Tuesday inside a Fort Hood residence, officials say.

According to the Houston Chronicle, Fort Hood officials said the bodies were discovered around 7:15 a.m.

Two Children, One Man Found Dead at Fort Hood

The main entrance of the Army base at Fort Hood, Texas, where authorities say three individuals were found dead Tuesday morning. (AP/LM Otero)

Christopher Grey, a spokesman for the Army’s Criminal Investigation Command, told the Houston Chronicle the deceased were “military family members” and that the investigation is ongoing.

“We do not believe there is any further threat to the community at this time,” he added.

Re-blogged from The Blaze

Two Children, One Man Found Dead at Fort Hood
Oliver Darcy
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 20:30:42 GMT

Is This the Personal Drone of the Future?

 

Gone are the days where drones are limited to giant, military-style aircraft. How far have we come? Consider that there soon may be a drone small enough to fit in your pocket.

AirDroids, an unmanned aerial systems developer out of San Diego, has developed a small, stable drone with collapsible propellers that can shrink down to the size of an average tablet. The Pocket Drone has the capability to carry small personal cameras, like a GoPro, to give the user a unique vantage point.

Is This the Personal Drone of the Future?

AirDroids new unmanned aerial system is called the Pocket Drone, because its collapsible rotors and propellers allow the user to easily carry the device in a small case or a pocket the size of an average mobile tablet. (Credit: AirDroids).

The Federal Aviation Administration allows for these remotely-controlled devices to fly at altitudes up to 400 feet, and companies like AirDroids and DJI have introduced their version of personal drones to the market.

AirDroids claims 2014 will be “the year of the drones.” Their Pocket Drone is an example of the excitement the public has about the idea – the company has received 10 times the projected funding for their Kickstarter project.

AirDroids’ Kickstarter page explains:

Everybody can already take great looking photos and videos with their camera phones and share them online, but they have been limited to what could seen from the ground…(now) it’s never been easier to capture spectacular aerial images that open up a whole new perspective and insight that had previously been unseen.

Amazon’s futuristic plans to deliver small packages via drones caught nationwide attention last month, but the FAA has yet to authorize widespread use of commercial drones in U.S. airspace.

The use of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) for personal use, however (much like the use of model aircraft), is not limited by the same restrictions.

Privacy and pervasive surveillance concerns do worry the skeptics, and the potential for overcrowded airspace is an issue. But advocates argue that a safe, regulated market can offer unprecedented opportunities for photography, disaster relief, weather monitoring, reporting and e-commerce deliveries.

So The Blaze wants to know: What would you do with a drone? If the sky is the limit, where would you take your unmanned aerial system?

Re-blogged from The Blaze

Is This the Personal Drone of the Future?
Elizabeth Kreft
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 20:41:42 GMT

Former Virginia Gov. McDonnell, Wife Charged For Illegally Accepting Gifts From Wealthy Businessman

 

Former Virginia Gov. Robert McDonnell (R) and his wife Maureen were charged in federal court Tuesday for illegally accepting gifts, according to The Washington Post.

Former Va. Gov McDonnell, Wife Charged For Illegally Accepting Gifts From Wealthy Businessman

Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell gestures as he delivers his State of the Commonwealth address before a joint session of the 2014 General Assembly at the Capitol in Richmond, Va., Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2014. (AP/Steve Helber)

The gifts, from wealthy dietary supplement businessman Jonnie R. Williams Sr. who was allegedly seeking special treatment from the state government, included luxury vacations and large loans, the Post reported.

In exchange, McDonnell allegedly used the prestige of the governorship to help Williams’ struggling business.

Re-blogged from The Blaze

Former Virginia Gov. McDonnell, Wife Charged For Illegally Accepting Gifts From Wealthy Businessman
Oliver Darcy
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 20:54:29 GMT

‘Sensitive’ Docs Reveal Obama Admin. Gave Muslim Brotherhood VIP Treatment, Let Members Bypass Airport Security

 

The U.S. State Department provided members of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood with VIP treatment at JFK airport and exempted them from extra security screening, according to internal government documents.

The preferential treatment, referred to as “port courtesy,” is generally reserved for visiting dignitaries but was reportedly provided to members of the Muslim Brotherhood in March and April of 2012. The development was first reported by the Investigative Project on Terrorism, which compiled State Department documents obtained as part of a Freedom of Information Act request.

Sensitive Docs Reveal U.S. Govt Let Muslim Brotherhood Members Bypass Airport Security

(FILE)

The U.S. government welcomed the Muslim Brotherhood and its Freedom and Justice Party with open arms even before they took over the Egyptian government in 2012.

Documents, marked “sensitive but unclassified,” show that one senior Muslim Brotherhood official, Abdul Mawgoud Dardery, was even escorted through security checkpoints at JFK. He also reportedly avoided all “secondary inspection,” which includes TSA agents going through baggage and electronic equipment belonging to potential security threats.

Dardery had “been linked to a child pornography investigation in the United States years earlier. Under normal circumstances, he likely would have been subjected to extra scrutiny,” according to the Investigative Project on Terrorism.

“We did not hear anything further from the MB [Muslim Brotherhood] so we assume to departure went smoothly,” a department official reported after the trip.

TheBlaze has reached out to the State Department and will update this story should they respond.

Though the Muslim Brotherhood took over the Egyptian government when Mohammed Morsi was elected president in 2012, the Islamist group was overthrown during a military coup in 2013.

The Brotherhood and its supporters have held near daily protests since Morsi’s ouster but over the past weeks, the cumulative weight of a tough security crackdown that killed hundreds and jailed top leaders has left the group deeply weakened.

“The Muslim Brotherhood was founded in Egypt in 1928 with the goal of establishing a worldwide Islamic state. Just weeks before the delegation visited the United States, a Brotherhood spokesman said that goal remained at the forefront of the group’s ambitions,” the IPT report adds.

Re-blogged from The Blaze

‘Sensitive’ Docs Reveal Obama Admin. Gave Muslim Brotherhood VIP Treatment, Let Members Bypass Airport Security
Jason Howerton
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:04:08 GMT

Monday, January 20, 2014

Van Susteren Claims WH Source Told Her to Warn Fox Reporter to Back Off Benghazi

 

Fox News Channel's Greta Van Susteren claims someone in the Obama administration told her to direct colleague Jennifer Griffin to stop investigating and reporting on the deadly September 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. compound and CIA annex in Benghazi.

Van Susteren wrote:

I remembered a disturbing phone call from a good friend in the Obama Administration. I have known this friend for years. The call was a short time after 9/11 (maybe Oct. 2012?) In the call, my friend told me that my colleague Jennifer Griffin, who was aggressively reporting on Benghazi, was wrong and that, as a favor to me, my friend in the Administration was telling me so that I could tell Jennifer so that she did not ruin her career. My friend was telling me to tell Jennifer to stop her reporting. Ruin her career?

In 20 plus years, I have never received a call to try and shut down a colleague – not that I even could – this was a first. Here is what I know: Jennifer is a class act...experienced...and a very responsible journalist. One of the absolute best in the business – no axe to grind, she just wants the facts.

I told my friend before I go to Jennifer telling her she is wrong, I need proof she is wrong, strong proof and you need to be specific - what are you saying she is getting wrong? We went around and around — including the statement again that this was just a call as a favor to Jennifer and me to save Jennifer’s career from reporting incorrect information. I got no proof. Zero. I smelled a rat. Favor to me? Hardly. My friend was trying to use me. I feel bad that a friend did that to me, tried to use me for a dirty reason. I knew then — and it is now confirmed by BIPARTISAN Senate Intelligence Committee — Jennifer was getting her facts right. I think it is really low for the Administration to stoop this low.

In her post on Gretawire, Van Susteren points out that in the early days following the assault on the facility, Fox was not invited to participate in a conference call hosted by the State Department press shop regarding the attack that other media outlets were invited to.

"Our friends in other media outlets were scandalized that Fox was not included and told us all about it. They were suspicious of State Department forgetting us/Fox and courageous to tip us off. The State Department claimed it was [an] accident and not intentional," Van Susteren writes.

However, it did not stop there. The network was later shut out of a CIA briefing that other outlets were invited to:

Then we had to listen to all the silliness about a video…what was with that? Did anyone ever really think that was legitimate?

And there were many times in the months and years since September 2012 when Obama Administration officials would make comments to suggest that Fox was just doing the Benghazi reporting for political reasons. The Administration was doing what it could to deter and demean the Fox News Channel investigation. They did not want to give us the facts — so their strategy was to attempt to belittle and demean our reporting.

It should be noted that CBS News' Sharyl Attkisson frustrated the administration and her employer with her Benghazi attack investigation. The Washington Post reported in May of 2013 that her own network was growing discouraged with her reporting of the issue, and she was having problems getting her Benghazi stories aired. The administration's constant stonewalling of the CBS reporter never deterred her, but it did annoy the veteran journalist.

The Post reported:

I find [that] improper,” she said. “You could say suspicious.” Suspicious? “We don’t know what we don’t know,” she says. “There could be political reasons or valid national security reasons [for not replying]. I just don’t know. I know they haven’t made a good argument” for why public disclosure of the material would harm national security.

In August of 2013, it was confirmed that Attkisson's computer had been hacked. CBS News spokeswoman Sonya McNair said that a cybersecurity firm hired by CBS News "has determined through forensic analysis [that] Attkisson's computer was accessed by an unauthorized, external, unknown party on multiple occasions in late 2012." CBS, however, did not accuse the government of accessing Attkisson's computer. This revelation came on the heels of the Justice Department's July 2013 seizures of Fox News Channel's James Rosen's e-mails.

Many sources related to the Benghazi attack were stifled by the administration as well. Breitbart News first reported in December of 2012 that the State Department was keeping American evacuees from Benghazi from speaking to Congress. Additionally, Breitbart News first noted in February of 2013 that Benghazi survivors were more than likely forced to sign non-disclosure agreements immediately following the assault on the compound.

According to Fox News, the FBI interviewed Benghazi survivors over a three-day period shortly after the attack. None of the survivors mentioned a protest over a video critical of Islam.

Re-blogged from Breitbart News

Van Susteren Claims WH Source Told Her to Warn Fox Reporter to Back Off Benghazi
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:18:05 GMT

Obama: ‘There’s No Doubt’ That Some People Really Dislike Me Because I’m Black

 

President Barack Obama said there’s “no doubt” that some people genuinely dislike him because of the color of his skin.

Obama: Theres No Doubt That Some People Really Dislike Me Because Im Black

AP

“There’s no doubt that there’s some folks who just really dislike me because they don’t like the idea of a black president,” Obama said in a new wide-ranging interview with The New Yorker. “Now, the flip side of it is there are some black folks and maybe some white folks who really like me and give me the benefit of the doubt precisely because I’m a black president.”

Obama has faced falling poll numbers and been hit with multiple controversies during his second term in office, including the heavily botched rollout of his signature health care law; embarrassing surveillance revelations from National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden; and October’s partial government shutdown.

Re-blogged from The Blaze

Obama: ‘There’s No Doubt’ That Some People Really Dislike Me Because I’m Black
Madeleine Morgenstern
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:46:40 GMT

84-Year-Old Left Bloodied After Encounter With NYPD. His Initial Crime? Not Something You’d Expect.

 

How often have you crossed the street without the walk signal, effectively jaywalking, and gotten away with it? Well, a man in New York City was not only stopped by police for committing the minor traffic crime, but he required medical treatment after an altercation with the officers ensued.

Kang Wong crossed at the intersection of 96th and Broadway in Manhattan Sunday around 5 p.m. without the right of way, the New York Post reported. According to witnesses who spoke with the newspaper, NYPD told Wong to stop but the man didn’t seem to understand.

jaywalking

Police cracking down on jaywalking in the area after three fatalities within nine days stopped a man who crossed the street in New York City illegally. He didn’t appear to understand the officer, resisted and ended up requiring medical treatment for injuries to his face. (Image source: WPIX-TV)

“The guy didn’t seem to speak English. The cop walked him over to the Citibank,” Ian King, who witnessed the incident, told the Post. “[The officer] stood him up against the wall and was trying to write him a ticket. The man didn’t seem to understand, and he started walking away.”

The officer tried to pull the man back but he resisted.

“As soon as he pushed the cop, it was like cops started running in from everywhere,” King told the Post.

In the end, Wong was taken to St. Luke’s Hospital for treatment for a bloody face before he was led to the police office. Check out the New York Post’s article for photos of the man’s injuries.

Wong’s son, who wished to avoid being named, told the newspaper he thinks “the cops are playing games,” not telling him what his father would be charged with at first. Then at the precinct, the 41-year-old son learned the crime.

“Oh, great! Beating up on an 84-year-old man for jaywalking,’’ he said, according to the Post.

Vision Zero's biggest obstacle: re-education of the NYPD. https://t.co/FHGbr2eluE

Kang Wong 84 Bloodied By NYPD After Jaywalking in Area Where Three Fatalities Have Occurredabout 15 hours ago via webReplyRetweetFavorite

Kang Wong 84 Bloodied By NYPD After Jaywalking in Area Where Three Fatalities Have Occurred

@BrooklynSpoke

Brooklyn Spoke

In addition to jaywalking, the Post reported that Wong was charged with “resisting arrest, obstructing governmental administration and disorderly conduct.”

Wong’s family said they might press charges against the officers’ actions, while the NYPD told the Post they were reviewing the incident.

Police have been targeting this area for jaywalking recently as the third person within nine days was struck and killed after crossing without the light on Sunday morning, the New York Daily News reported.

Watch WPIX-TV’s report about the pedestrian fatalities:

The Daily News noted that a sign warning against jaywalking was posted in the area.

“We won’t sit by while lives are lost and families are torn apart,” Phil Walzak, mayor’s office spokesman, said in light of the three deaths, according to the Daily News. “These latest crashes underscore the urgent need to make our streets safer, which is why we are moving decisively to … harness the power of city government to end this epidemic.”

Featured image via Shutterstock.

Re-blogged from The Blaze

84-Year-Old Left Bloodied After Encounter With NYPD. His Initial Crime? Not Something You’d Expect.
Liz Klimas
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:53:26 GMT